It’s highly unlikely that this will change, as it’s probably not appropriate, but it’s up for consideration. I make no attempt at anything like melody (unlike, for instance, Hagel).I would love to Moretti-fy the tag data.Seriously, somebody must already have this. hiatus, hiatus-at-caesura, diastole, correption, lengthening-at-caesura, no-correption, no-correption-at-caesura, etc). It would also be good to tag various caesura options (e.g three-folders, lines without pause), and metrical anomalies features (e.g. Perhaps they can be persuaded to publish their raw data. Then again, full semantic tagging is not the aim of this project, some of these would involve significant interpretive choices, and I know that various scholars have their own versions of some of this, some at least partly published in paper format and restricted online interfaces. We could also tag similes, speech intro formulas etc. There’s also Agamemnon’s remarkable speech in book 19, which involves the only mutli-line embedded direct speech in the Iliad so we need tags for speaker-inside-speaker. I have speakers tagged, but addressees would be good, as would speaker metadata (gender, human/god, god-in-disguise-as, god-in-dream, person-as-ghost etc.), speech type (prayer, supplication, flyting etc.). I’d like to add more semantic info to the files at some point, perhaps working with treebank data.And I am a rhythmically challenged person, so I need to consult with a drummer friend or two. When I pause at a caesura, the pause length is consistent (for the most part) no matter the place of the caesura in the rhythm. This means, among other things, that there is always a line-end pause before an enjambed word. I give each line 8 beats, so the rhythm is perfectly stichic, however the caesura is treated. The basic rhythmic framework of my reading has some major assumptions.It may not be necessary to be, but we’ll see. I’ve not been consistent in those decisions so far. elision, lengthening and hiatus at the caesura all require decisions about pronunciation.phrasing of enjambment and treatment of caesura seem to me to be linked.In any case, it’s linked to the next one: It may represent a useful intuition, or it may just be a bad habit. I’m averse to 4th foot caesuras, generally opting to read without pause or to pause at a weak 3rd foot word break rather than observe them.If you’ve been listening, you’ll have noticed a few things about the way I treat caesuras.Or I may need to decide if I’m reading an 8th century poem or a 3rd century text. Consistency may not be necessary, but there may be some patterns to be discovered here. The more I read, the less I pronounced them, but a few still seemed necessary.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |